The Logical Reconstruction and Path Exploration of the Vitality of Ideological and Political Theory Courses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71204/tdhndr96Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Ideological and Political Theory Course, Educational Digitalization, Human–Machine Collaboration, Algorithmic EnclosureAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), exemplified by large-scale models, is reshaping the educational landscape and accelerating the transition from digitalization to intelligent transformation. Ideological and Political (IP) courses face both new opportunities and emerging risks. Anchored in value orientation and educational principles, this paper traces the historical logic of change and identifies key structural challenges: attention dispersion, algorithmic enclosure, and capacity mismatch. We propose a three-dimensional framework of influence. First, a cognitive shift from indoctrination and rote memorization to problem-driven, evidence-based, and reflective learning. Second, a discursive shift from one-way transmission to multi-source co-construction with explicit value interpretation. Third, a relational shift from knowledge mediation to value leadership, instructional design, and data stewardship. Building on this framework, we outline practical pathways for intelligent content iteration, immersive experiences combined with rational debriefing, personalized support grounded in integrity safeguards, and renewed teacher professionalism for human–machine collaboration. Finally, we propose an institutional architecture emphasizing value guidance, collaborative mechanisms, shared resource ecosystems, digital–ethical literacy for teachers, and proportionate data governance. We argue that only through coupling value rationality with technical rationality, under transparent and auditable safeguards, can IP courses enhance their ideological depth, emotional resonance, and practical effectiveness.
References
Baker, R. S., Martin, T., & Rossi, L. M. (2016). Educational data mining and learning analytics. The Wiley handbook of cognition and assessment: Frameworks, methodologies, and applications, 379-396.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction (4th ed.).
Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. (1st ed.). Center for Curriculum Redesign: Boston, MA, USA.
Jia, X. (2023). Constructing the knowledge system of college ideological and political courses from a holistic perspective. Party Building and Ideological Education in Schools.
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012/2015). The knowledge-learning-instruction framework and cognitive tutors. Cognitive Science, 36 (2012), 757–798.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. UCL Knowledge Lab: London, UK
Wang, J. (2023). Generation, risks, and countermeasures of AI empowerment in college ideological and political courses. Jiangsu Higher Education, 2023(9), 77-83.
Yan, J., & Gao, C. (2023). AI-driven transformation of teaching paradigms in college ideological and political courses. Lingnan Journal, 37(2), 101-110.
Zhang, J. (2023). Educational reflections on ChatGPT: Ethical limits and challenges. E-Education Research, 44(9), 13-20.
Zhang, X., & Huang, Y. (2022). Challenges and countermeasures of AI empowerment in IP courses. Journal of Suzhou University of Science and Technology (Social Science), 39(2), 62-68.
Zhang, Y., Wang, M., Rong, L., et al. (2024). Can ChatGPT serve as an emotional expert? Journal of Peking University (Natural Science).
Zhao, J., & Liu, Y. (2022). On the deep integration of AI and IP courses. Journal of Guangdong University of Education, 42(3), 45-50.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yequan Wang (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited. Authors retain copyright of their work, and readers are free to copy, share, adapt, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as appropriate attribution is given.
