Practical Dilemmas and Optimization Paths of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Higher Vocational Colleges under the Background of New Quality Productive Forces

Authors

  • Li Li Guangdong Eco-Engineering Polytechnic Author
  • Xiaojia Cai Guangdong Eco-Engineering Polytechnic Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/86y9zq65

Keywords:

New Quality Productive Forces, Higher Vocational Colleges, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education, Practical Dilemmas, Optimization Paths

Abstract

Driven by technological innovation, new quality productive forces place higher demands on the overall competence of the labor force, thereby assigning new contemporary connotations and missions to innovation and entrepreneurship education in higher vocational colleges. This paper examines the practical challenges confronted by such education within this emerging context. The findings indicate several prominent issues: a misalignment between curriculum design and industrial needs, insufficient innovation and entrepreneurship capabilities among faculty, inadequate depth in practical training platforms and industry-education integration, and a limited guiding function of existing evaluation mechanisms. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a set of systematic optimization strategies: reconstructing the curriculum system based on the integrated development of science–education–industry; cultivating “dual-qualified” faculty who possess both theoretical knowledge and practical experience; building collaborative practical training platforms that involve government, industry, academia, research, and application sectors; and establishing diversified evaluation mechanisms that emphasize innovative outcomes. The study concludes that higher vocational colleges must actively align with the development requirements of new quality productive forces, deepen the reform of innovation and entrepreneurship education, and cultivate high-quality technical and skilled talents who demonstrate innovative thinking, entrepreneurial awareness, and creative problem-solving capabilities.

References

Gan, L., Feng, L., & Bi, M. (2025). Realistic dilemmas and optimization paths of innovation and entrepreneurship education in universities under the background of new quality productive forces. Modern Education Management, 1–9. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/21.1570.G4.20251023.1422.007

Lü, Y., & Liang, Z. (2025). The value, dilemmas, and paths of integrating digital intelligence technology into university innovation and entrepreneurship education under the background of new quality productive forces. Education Theory and Practice, 45(30), 3–7.

Ma, Y., & He, J. (2024). University innovation and entrepreneurship education promoting the development of new quality productive forces: Theoretical logic, realistic dilemmas, and implementation approaches. Chinese University Students Employment, (7), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.20017/j.cnki.1009-0576.2024.07.003

Tian, Y., & Ma, T. (2025). Higher education empowering the development of new quality productive forces: Internal logic and implementation paths. Education Theory and Practice, 45(12), 3–8.

Xinhua News Agency. (2024, February 2). Xi Jinping stresses accelerating the development of new quality productive forces and solidly advancing high-quality development at the 11th collective study session of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee. People’s Daily, p. 1.

Yu, H., & Zhang, L. (2024). Research on cultivating top-notch innovative talents in universities under the conditions of new quality productive forces. Education Theory and Practice, 44(27), 3–8.

Zhou, W. (2025). Realistic dilemmas and system optimization paths of innovation and entrepreneurship education in higher vocational colleges. Shipbuilding Vocational Education, 13(3), 9–12.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

Practical Dilemmas and Optimization Paths of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Higher Vocational Colleges under the Background of New Quality Productive Forces. (2025). The Development of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.71204/86y9zq65