Virtual Reality in Sustainable Development Education: Insights from Finnish Classrooms

Ailun Ma

doi:10.71204/jzewg055

Authors

Ailun Ma Beijing Normal University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/jzewg055

Keywords:

Virtual Reality, Virtual Pedagogy, Sustainable Development Education, Experiential Learning, Systemic Thinking, Interdisciplinary Education, Digital Pedagogy

Abstract

This paper investigates the integration of virtual reality (VR) in teaching sustainable development within various educational contexts in Finland. VR offers immersive, experiential learning opportunities that enhance students’ understanding of complex concepts, fostering both cognitive and affective learning. Key challenges include field-specific adoption, second-language learner support, and logistical constraints. A case study on ThingLink’s VR tool highlights its strengths and limitations in fostering systemic thinking. The paper concludes with recommendations for improving VR pedagogy and enhancing its impact on interdisciplinary education.

References

Aaltonen, S., Pentsinen, H., & Kurikka, O. (2021). Distribution of medicines virtually in Taitaja. 3DBear. https://www.3dbear.io/fi/blogi/l%C3%A4%C3%A4sharesvirtually

Aiello, P., D’Elia, F., Di Torre, S., & Sibilio, M. (2012). A constructivist approach to virtual reality for experiential learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(3). https://www.wwwords.co.uk/ELEA/A_Constructivist_Approach_to_Virtual_Reality_for_Experiential_Learning_(sagepub.com)

Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678.

Bailenson, J. (2018). Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do. W. W. Norton & Company.

Berkman, M. I. (2024). History of virtual reality. In Encyclopedia of computer graphics and games (pp. 873–881). Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-031-23161-2_169

Dede, C. (2017). Introduction: Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. In D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, & J. Richards (Eds.), Virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality in education. Springer.

Dede, C. (2019). Designing immersive authentic simulations that enhance motivation and learning: EcoLearn. In R. Feldman (Ed.), Learning science: Theory, research, practice (pp. 229–259). McGraw-Hill.

Finnish Medical Association Duodecim. (2019). ADHD: Käypä hoito –suositus (Valid treatment recommendation). https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi50061#K1

Finnish Museum Association. (2024). Opimuseossa.fi’s internet website: Virtual museums and guided tours. https://opimuseossa.fi/opimuseossa/index.php?k=12378

Fraser, K. M. (2012). Emotion, cognitive load, and learning outcomes during simulation training. Medical Education, 46(11), 1055–1062.

Hemminki-Reijonen, U. (2021). Virtual reality in learning: A guide for the teacher (Board of Education: Guides and Handbooks, Vol. 2021:3). Finnish National Agency for Education. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/Virtuaaalitodellisuus_oppimissä.pdf

Johnson, P., Millar, R., & Zhang, X. (2021). Virtual reality in sustainable development education: A Finnish case study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(5), 347–362.

Lee, H., Jung, T. H., Dieck, M. C. T., & Chung, N. (2020). Experiencing immersive virtual reality in museums. Information & Management, 57(5), 103229.

Lowood, H. E. (2024). Virtual reality. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/virtual-reality

Mills, S., Brown, T., & Perez, R. (2019). Augmented and virtual realities in education: A review of empirical research. Computers & Education, 140, 103–120.

Xie, M., & Li, Y. (2023). Enhancing student engagement through virtual reality: A study on environmental education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(1), 25–40.