Living Inheritance or Digital Alienation ? The Ethical Dilemma and Path Selection of the Inheritance of Intangible Cultural Heritage Digital People
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71204/ryd15635Keywords:
Intangible Cultural Heritage, Digital Humans, Digital Ethics, Public Perceptions, Living TransmissionAbstract
Digital technologies are increasingly used to document, interpret, and disseminate intangible cultural heritage (ICH), and AI-enabled digital humans have emerged as a new medium for its communication and transmission. This study classifies ICH digital humans into three functional types: performance and dissemination, craft-skill replication, and educational assistance. It examines the ethical tensions that arise when the logic of technological reproduction intersects with the people-centred and practice-based character of living heritage transmission. Based on a questionnaire survey conducted between May 10 and June 10, 2026, the study obtained 521 valid responses from participants with different ages, educational backgrounds, and occupations. The questionnaire covered five dimensions: respondent characteristics, perceptions of ICH transmission, awareness and use of ICH digital humans, digital-ethics concerns, and preferences for future governance. The findings point to three interrelated dimensions of potential digital alienation: distortion of cultural content and authenticity through standardised reproduction; structural imbalance in transmission arising from the interaction of technological and commercial pressures; and divergent public evaluations associated with demographic and cognitive differences. In response, the study proposes three pathways: differentiated standards and meaningful participation by ICH bearers; a human-centred human–machine model supported by transparent content review and commercial oversight; and targeted public education that addresses differences in age and educational background. These findings offer empirical insights into the responsible use of digital humans in ICH safeguarding and transmission.
References
Alivizatou, M. (2012). Intangible heritage and the museum: New perspectives on cultural preservation. Left Coast Press.
Foka, A., & Griffin, G. (2024). AI, cultural heritage, and bias: Some key queries that arise from the use of GenAI. Heritage, 7(11), 6125–6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7110287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7110287
Fu, Y., Shi, K., & Xi, L. (2025). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in the preservation and innovation of intangible cultural heritage: Ethical considerations and design frameworks. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 40(2), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf034
Galani, S., & Vosinakis, S. (2024). An augmented reality approach for communicating intangible and architectural heritage through digital characters and scale models. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 28, 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-024-01792-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-024-01792-x
Giaccardi, E. (Ed.). (2012). Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203112984
Hua, Y., Ding, L., Dong, H., & Lin, Z. (2024). Influence of user-generated content (UGC) in social media on the intangible cultural heritage preservation of Gen Z tourists in the digital economy era. International Journal of Tourism Research, 26(5), Article e2743. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2743
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 56(1–2), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x
Liu, J., Chen, C., Zou, H., Zheng, J., & Gao, D. (2025). Preserving China’s intangible cultural heritage through AR/VR storytelling, social media, and AI narratives. npj Heritage Science, 13, Article 685. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-02265-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-02265-x
Ren, K., & Lam, J. F. I. (2026). Knowledge graph-driven digital preservation of intangible cultural heritage: A cross-cultural comparative study of Chinese and Western implementation paradigms. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, Article 147. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06186-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06186-9
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263
Tan, Y.-C., Yang, L.-H., & Wang, B. (2026). Community-engaged digital safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage: A review of methods and challenges. npj Heritage Science, 14, Article 184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02458-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02458-y
Tiribelli, S., Pansoni, S., Frontoni, E., & Giovanola, B. (2024). Ethics of artificial intelligence for cultural heritage: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3432407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3432407
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention
UNESCO. (2015). Ethical principles for safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/ethics-and-ich-00866
UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
UNESCO. (2024). Basic texts of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2024 ed.). https://ich.unesco.org/en/basic-texts-00503
Wei, S., Wang, L., Xu, S., Xu, J., Wang, M., Shi, J., Fan, H., & Gan, F. (2026). How digital technologies empower the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage: A scoping review of research from 2020 to 2025. npj Heritage Science, 14, Article 557. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02774-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02774-3
Ye, X., Ruan, Y., Xia, S., & Gu, L. (2025). Adoption of digital intangible cultural heritage: A configurational study integrating UTAUT2 and immersion theory. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04222-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04222-8
Zhang, J., & Xu, C. (2024). A grounded theory-based model of information communication in cultural heritage digital reading on the social media from the perspective of the embodied theory. Heritage Science, 12, Article 208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01313-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01313-2
Zhang, Y., Ikiz Kaya, D., & van Wesemael, P. J. V. (2024). An assessment framework for digital participatory practices engaging youth in cultural heritage management. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 70, 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2024.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2024.10.014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zixuan Huang, Ruimin Wang, Wenxuan Jing (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited. Authors retain copyright of their work, and readers are free to copy, share, adapt, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as appropriate attribution is given.
How to Cite
